Hello,
I'd have one more question.
I need to have many \subsubject behind each other (again: actually processing
an external file, but a small example is attached):
---
\setupbodyfont[11pt]
\starttext
\subsubsubject{001}
\subsubsubject{002}
\subsubsubject{003}
\subsubsubject{004
On Tue, Oct 12 2010, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
The problem is that typesetting n-th \subsubject doesn't go to the next
page, but is typeset on the same page, so that the last ones disappear.
This works, but I can't explain why:
\starttext
Am 12.10.2010 um 09:13 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.:
Hello,
I'd have one more question.
I need to have many \subsubject behind each other (again: actually processing
an external file, but a small example is attached):
Am 12.10.2010 um 09:13 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.:
Hello,
I'd have one more question.
I need to have many \subsubject behind each other (again: actually processing
an external file, but a small example is attached):
Thanks, it works perfectly.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:18:54 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 12.10.2010 um 09:13 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.:
Hello,
I'd have one more question.
I need to have many \subsubject behind each other (again:
2010/10/12 Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. l...@pontex.cz:
Thanks, it works perfectly.
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:18:54 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
• the ctx file extension has a special meaning for context (file for
proprocessing in xml format).
-
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:40:19 +0200, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
• the ctx file extension has a special meaning for context (file for
proprocessing in xml format).
- OK, I'm planning to use .tex for Ctx files in the future. Now I'm using
LaTeX and ConTeXt both, so I use .ctx
2010/10/12 Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. l...@pontex.cz:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:40:19 +0200, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com
You can also use .mkiv for ConTeXt MKIV
Yes, it sounds better. I noticed .mkiv files in Ctx installation tree but I
thought this extension is reserved for
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:35:01AM +0200, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r.
o. wrote:
- OK, I'm planning to use .tex for Ctx files in the future. Now I'm using
LaTeX and ConTeXt both, so I use .ctx extension for Ctx sources. Moreover,
till I'm trying to achieve the same things in Ctx as
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:
Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with
old OS and perhaps MIME questions.
What? You mean DOS? And FAT?
Maybe we should restrict our coding as well to ascii...
Alan
P.S. I am still using some real-time
On 12-10-2010 11:30, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:
Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with
old OS and perhaps MIME questions.
What? You mean DOS? And FAT?
Maybe we should restrict our coding as well to ascii...
it's
On 10/12/2010 11:30 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:
Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with
old OS and perhaps MIME questions.
What? You mean DOS? And FAT?
Maybe we should restrict our coding as well to ascii...
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 10:49:18 luigi scarso wrote:
Yes; a good point for three letters for suffix is compatibility with
old OS and perhaps MIME questions.
What? You mean DOS? And FAT?
yes; more generally I think
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:36:26 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
But as far as I know, windows still bases its file type detection
on extension, so that is something to keep in mind.
Oh, Windows... (written with disdain)
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:45:28 luigi scarso wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Alan BRASLAU alan.bras...@cea.fr wrote:
P.S. I am still using some real-time applications
running on computers under DOS, but I would not dream
of trying to put ConTeXt on such a system!
Maybe
On 12-10-2010 12:12, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 11:36:26 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
But as far as I know, windows still bases its file type detection
on extension, so that is something to keep in mind.
Oh, Windows... (written with disdain)
actually I like the filetype /
16 matches
Mail list logo
